Are you ready to take the thrill of a shark-infested ride through fields of corn? Put on your seat, because "Sharks of the Corn" is here to deliver a wild ride of horror as well as comedy. Director is famous Tim Ritter, this ultra budget film draws inspiration from Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) and reworks it into a hilarious and bizarre humor satire that'll leave you in a state of confusion while rolling around at the sound of laughter.
In a Cornfield Carnival of Chaos
In the first scene, a cornfield that appears innocent "Sharks of the Corn" introduces the film's quirky nature. We are introduced to Gary and Susan and Susan, two people who disappear into the background while the movie drifts out in different ways. The story blends horror elements with an abundance of subplots. They create a fascinating blend that can be described as a cornfield-style carnival of chaos.
A Psychoopathic Shark Enthusiast
Then there's Teddy Bo Lucas, a name that gives an added layer of madness to an unsettling storyline. The psychotic shark enthusiast is an uncanny love affair with these water-based predators. Just as if the sight of sharks in fields weren't interesting enough, Teddy extends his fascination another level when his shocking act of murder occurs in his hotel room. It's a shocking incident that sets the stage to a frenzy full of intrigue, suspicion and awe.
The Confusion Cults as well as Sharks
The plot becomes more intricate as authorities place the blame on poor Gary for Susan's murder, with no motivation. In the meantime, a shark cult develops into a unique subplot, introducing us to some world where cornfields as well as Shark worship meet. In the midst of thinking it's not going to get any more crazy, two bumbling burglars decide to snatch a shark's pup from this religion. It's an unsettling mix of horror and comedy that keeps viewers on the edge.
Critiques and Comic Relief
While "Sharks of the Corn" is a truly unique and unorthodox experience, it's not devoid of any flaws. The movie often switches between several characters and scenes making some viewers feel lost in a struggle to comprehend the various plot lines. It's a deliberate stylistic choice that adds to the spoof quality of the movie, but it may not be anyone's cup.
The production values of the film are in the wrong direction, as is the acting, which falls into the category of unreliable. But, in the midst that is filled with poor acting, Steve Guynn shines through with his commendable portrayal, actually being the character rather than being merely repeating line after line. It's an exceptional example of genuine acting in a sea filled with exaggerated performance.
Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines
"Sharks of the Corn" showcases its low-budget appeal with the use of cheap effects which have been able to create a certain appeal. The majority of shark attacks are hilariously portrayed by hand puppets. This adds some humour to the film. The absurd plot, that revolves about a shark-cult's attempt in order to resurrect a god of the sea that is (click blog posts) where the story really unleashes its imagination. This creativity, however, often does not translate into an exciting viewer experience.
Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional
One aspect where "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't quite measure up is the cinematography. The cinematography and frame work come across as amateurish, lacking the polish and finesse that is typically found with mainstream horror films. Although this could be intended in keeping the look of low-budget films, it does impact the overall quality of the viewing experience.
To conclude "Sharks of the Corn" has a more mellow taste. It's a slow and unengaging (blog) mixture of stories that can be confusing of. Low production values confusion in plotlines and questionable acting may turn off people looking for a more refined horror comedy experience. For those who are interested in low-quality entertainment films "Sharks of the Corn" has a hard time delivering all the laughs you'd expected.Final Rating 1 "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five
with its poor-quality video, audio, acting, and editing "Sharks of the Corn" does not quite meet the goal. Despite the potential for a entertaining spoof of a film, it's unable to produce a seamless and entertaining enjoyment. As a critic, I make a funny comment: films, like corn are best in the event that you throw explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" fails to make the grade.